Home » Blog Page » Why Baganda Were Polygamous: The Wisdom of the African Marriage System

Why Baganda Were Polygamous: The Wisdom of the African Marriage System

The question of “Why Baganda Are Polygamous – African Marriage System?” often evokes strong reactions, particularly in a contemporary world where monogamy is idealized as the norm. To many Western observers, the practice of polygamy in Africa can appear to be an outdated and patriarchal relic. However, to truly grasp the complexities of this “African Marriage System,” especially within the context of the Baganda people of Uganda, we must move beyond these superficial judgments. Polygamy in Buganda was not merely a matter of individual desire or societal backwardness; rather, it was a deeply ingrained economic, social, and cultural framework that played a vital role in sustaining one of pre-colonial Africa’s most organized and prosperous kingdoms – Buganda. As a proud Muganda and historian, Mukiibi Hamza Katende, I invite you to journey with me to explore the historical roots and the profound rationale behind this African marital structure.

Buganda’s rich history is inextricably linked to its powerful monarchy, and the Kabakas of Buganda served as the central cultural figures, their practices often setting the tone for the rest of society. The fact that many Kabakas had numerous wives was not driven by mere personal indulgence but by strategic and economic considerations that had far-reaching implications for the kingdom’s stability and prosperity.  

Consider the historical accounts: Kabaka Suuna II is reported to have had over 20 wives, while Kabaka Muteesa I’s household included more than 84 wives and nearly a thousand concubines. These royal unions were far more than just about ensuring the continuation of the royal lineage. They were crucial in forging strong alliances between different Buganda clans, thereby solidifying the Kabaka’s power and ensuring the efficient management of the vast royal lands.

The Economic Logic of Polygamy: Labour, Land, and Sustenance

At its core, polygamy in Buganda was underpinned by a robust economic logic. When a Muganda man married a woman, he was obligated to provide her with a plot of land known as “akakande” – a term that has even given rise to family names like Kakande. This “akakande” served as the wife’s personal garden, her domain for cultivating the food necessary to sustain herself and her children.

As I, Mukiibi Hamza Katende, have often noted, “The wealth of a Muganda man was traditionally measured not solely in livestock, but significantly in the number of wives he had and the productivity of the gardens they cultivated.” Each wife, with the assistance of her children, contributed directly to the man’s overall wealth through their agricultural labor. In a society with limited access to hired labor, children were the primary workforce. Given that women would naturally be less able to engage in strenuous farm work during pregnancy and the period following childbirth, having multiple wives ensured a consistent and reliable labor force to keep the agricultural economy of the household running smoothly.

The relationship between labor and land was also crucial. Land in Buganda was relatively abundant, and maximizing its productivity was essential for both individual and communal prosperity. The more land a man possessed, the greater the need for hands to till it. Polygamy was the practical and logical solution to this demand.

Key aspects of this economic system included:

  • Separate Households and Gardens: Each wife typically managed her own household and cultivated her designated “akakande.”
  • Early Agricultural Education: Children grew up learning vital farming skills from a young age, contributing to the household’s productivity.
  • Self-Sustaining Units: A man’s household, with multiple wives and children, often became a self-sustaining economic unit, contributing to the kingdom’s overall agricultural output and tax base.


In this system, a man who demonstrated agricultural success could voluntarily offer tribute (“omusolo”) to the Kabaka. In return for this productive output and loyalty, the Kabaka might bestow upon him more land in a gesture of “okusiima” (gratitude or approval). This increase in landholding would, in turn, necessitate more labor, often leading to the man marrying another wife, thus reinforcing a beneficial economic cycle.

Social Harmony in a Polygamous Setting: Cooperation Over Conflict

One of the most frequently misunderstood facets of African polygamy, particularly from an outside perspective, is the assumption of constant rivalry and animosity among co-wives. While instances of jealousy undoubtedly occurred, the traditional Buganda social structure was intentionally designed to foster cooperation and harmony within polygamous households.

The first wife, often referred to as the “mukyala omukulu” (senior wife), typically held a position of respect and authority within the household. Subsequent wives were often viewed as helpers (“abakozi”) who were meant to assist the first wife in managing the household responsibilities and the cultivation of the land, rather than as rivals. As I often explain, “In a traditional Muganda homestead, co-wives were, in essence, co-farmers, co-mothers in raising the children, and in many significant ways, co-architects of the husband’s and the family’s enduring legacy.”

Maintaining harmony within a polygamous household was not only socially desirable but also a reflection of the husband’s leadership and character. A man who failed to keep peace among his wives was often viewed unfavorably within the community.

Cultural and Clan Considerations: Weaving a Social Fabric

Marriage in Buganda was not solely an individual affair; it was deeply embedded within the clan system and often served as a vital political tool. Marrying wives from different clans was a strategic way for a man to forge alliances across a broader social network. This practice helped to spread his influence, mitigate potential inter-clan conflicts, and foster a richer exchange of knowledge, skills, and traditions within the household.  

Each wife brought with her the unique values and customs of her clan, contributing to a diverse cultural environment within the home. This clan diversity often fostered a sense of balance and unity within the larger community.

Polygamy and Population Growth: Ensuring Continuity

In pre-colonial Africa, high mortality rates due to disease and other factors made having a large number of children crucial for ensuring the continuity of family lineages and the overall stability of society. Polygamy directly addressed this need. More wives naturally increased the potential for more offspring, providing a larger labor force, ensuring the survival of the family name, and providing support for parents in their old age.  

The Shift in Perception: From Pride to Shame Under Colonial Influence

The advent of the colonial era brought about a dramatic shift in the perception of African marital practices. Western missionaries and colonial administrators, viewing their own monogamous traditions as morally superior, often portrayed polygamy as a sign of sinfulness and backwardness, completely disregarding its inherent economic and cultural significance within African societies.  

Christian missionaries actively promoted and enforced monogamy as the only morally acceptable form of marriage. Colonial laws were often enacted that undermined and sought to dismantle traditional African marriage systems. The processes of urbanization and the introduction of formal Western education further promoted the nuclear family structure as the modern ideal. This sustained campaign of demonization led many Africans, particularly those who were educated in Western systems, to internalize a sense of shame and embarrassment regarding the practice of polygamy.  

As I have often lamented, “When we embraced foreign values without a critical understanding of our own historical context, we lost not just our traditions, but also the profound logic and wisdom that underpinned them.”

Is Polygamy Still Relevant Today? Navigating Modernity

While the social and economic landscape of Buganda has undergone significant transformations, rendering the traditional polygamous model less practical for many, the question of its continued relevance is complex. In contemporary Buganda, monogamous families are the prevalent norm, and urbanization has shifted the economic base away from purely agrarian models. However, in more rural areas and among older generations, polygamy still exists and, in some instances, continues to function according to principles similar to those of centuries past.

Rather than simply condemning polygamy as an outdated practice, modern society would benefit from a deeper understanding of its historical roots and the specific contexts in which it continues to exist.

Conclusion: Rediscovering African Wisdom in Our Marriage Systems

Polygamy among the Baganda was not a moral failing but a strategic, economic, and culturally significant system that was deeply rational within its historical context. It was intricately linked to land-based wealth, communal living, and the maintenance of social harmony. To dismiss it as merely backward without acknowledging its underlying logic is to do a profound disservice to the rich tapestry of African heritage.

Understanding “Why Baganda Are Polygamous – African Marriage System?” provides a valuable window into the sophisticated ways in which African societies organized themselves sustainably for generations. As I often conclude in my discussions of our history, “African traditions, when examined through the lens of their historical context and the practical necessities they addressed, often reveal a level of sophistication and wisdom that colonial narratives have consistently overlooked.” By embracing a more nuanced understanding of our past, we can better appreciate the ingenuity of our ancestors and navigate the complexities of our present with a deeper sense of our own identity and heritage.

Post navigation

Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *